You are in the company of Tony Blair...
What is his agenda?
     
 
     
 



New
Living Diary
Index


Renewing participatory democracy

"Tame the Corporations!"

My Little Red Book

A New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the Left!

Bevan
Re-visited
 

Multiple Differential Uncertainty


Who am I? Biography 

 

     


0093  Make sure you have not missed the previous edition of LivePolitics  Check it out  
And the one before that?  
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 47
Friday 22 November
2002


check out new Home Footnotes Page  

Moving My Way

 

 

 

The countdown to London's congestion-charge launch is now accompanied by calls for tolling to be extended to the M25. These partial measures will all end in tears.  The only satisfactory solution is my scheme for a universal Daily Usage Charge.

Let me know what you think


Government Parties
a new political phenomenon

The penny has finally dropped.  The growing sense of distance between the Labour Party and the Government has long puzzled me - and I now I understand why. Tony Blair, having occupied the Labour nest, is set upon using the institutional structures of Labour - cuckoo-like - to create a new, and entirely different, form of Government Party...

What do you think?       back to top


Is Gordon Brown using the top-up fee issue to define and stake out his leadership bid? Jonathan Freedland thinks so, writing on Wednesday in The Guardian..


check out new Home Footnotes Page  


Limiting Limited Liability

Upon the collapse of ITV Digital its two promoters (parent companies Carlton and Granada) simply "walked away" and abandoned all the creditors of their own stricken subsidiary.  Now International Power, the parent of the collapsing UK power-generator TXU, has similarly "walked away" - abandoning creditors owed £2.78 billion

Why not tip your toe in this debate?     back to top


Disarmed
Services

Speaking in Brussels ahead of this week’s NATO summit in Prague, NATO Secretary General George Robertson was scathing about the military investment programmes of NATO members.  The problem, he claimed, was that NATO troops were not action-ready.  He paints a horrifying picture of military and political ineptitude.

back to top


check out new Home Footnotes Page  


Workers’ Rights
not Union Rights

The assertion of "Union" rights is not a popular cause.  But the development of stronger systems of workers' rights strikes a chord with everyone. And as a socialist, I am more interested in workers’ rights than in union rights.

What do you think?       back to top


check out new Home Footnotes Page  


Wonderful  Water

Good, positive news about solutions to impending water shortages in the Middle East - a little good news, for a change...    back to top


check out new Home Footnotes Page  


Walwyn-Jones & Mendoza

This is the House of Lords case which decided last week - establishing that a statutory residential tenancy could be taken over as of right by the same-sex partner of a deceased statutory tenant.  Gay campaigners made much of the "precedent" - but that was much overstated...

Drop me a line     back to top


 

 

Continue  to
Home Footnotes page...

 

     

Homosexual Adoption
Liberal pitfalls

My daughter Katharine, who is an adviser and Policy Officer to the Children's Society, has been actively supporting the measure empowering gay and Lesbian couples to qualify as adoptive parents.  She took me to task this week for exaggerating the difficulties of such adoptions.  I certainly did not mean to imply that there were greater difficulties for homosexual couples than for heterosexual - merely that the law regulating all "unmarried cohabitation" was in disarray, and widely misunderstood. neither lawyers nor politicians have anything to be proud of, in this sector.  Labour should grasp the nettle of reform and create a new, properly-designed legal platform for all such civil relationships, creating a formal framework to perform the same legal functions as those of marriage - this is what I said.

What do you think?       back to top


A nasty, vicious Bill

The full text of the Government's Criminal Justice Bill has now been published, and debated in the Lords. It is a nasty, autocratic, measure. It is designed to whittle away the shield which English law has traditionally thrown around "the accused", changing the balance of judicial procedure still further. For the accused - all accused - it would become much more difficult to contend with the natural autocracy of the Police and the prosecuting authorities.  The scales of justice would be changed irreversibly in favour of the "Prosecution".

The Bill would make our society a nastier, more vicious, more unjust place to live. As with many Government proposals, it contains many potential tactical "concessions", and only a truncated Bill will  reach the statute book.  But if passed in its present form, it would strengthen the State against the citizen, critically destabilise our system of criminal justice, give rein to communal prejudices of all kinds, and lead to the unjust punishment of many more innocent people. 


check out new Home Footnotes Page  


Burning injustice

The Firefighters' dispute, running in parallel with the remuneration scandals of City remuneration, have triggered another orgy of public resentment over the injustice of personal rewards. These outbursts are a periodic feature of our media lives, never reaching any considered conclusion.  But in restraining the scandal of corporate greed and dishonesty, there is much that we could do.

thanks to BBC News for the blazing pic...


Labour's
"New Localism"
is flawed

David Walker, writing in The Guardian on Wednesday is entirely right to challenge Labour's concept of localism.  But he reaches, the wrong conclusion, paradoxically reinforcing by, the case for the destructive over-centralisation which we are currently experiencing.  Like many denizens of the capital, I suspect he has simply missed the point. The problem is that Labour's version of localism is deeply flawed. True localism has nothing to do with "earned autonomy", whether conceived in No 10 or No 11 Downing Street.  It means being entitled to do what you wish to do, within however limited a compass.

Let me explain what I mean.


Don't top-up, pay up

Financial crisis stalks our universities. This issue poses a real challenge to your political judgment.  For on the one hand, it must be common ground that graduates benefit enormously, personally and financially, from the successful completion of higher education.  But that does not make it wise to present all future students with the prospect of a huge lifetime debt...

What do you think?       back to top


Foundation Hospitals

This confused debate is leading nowhere.  Alan Milburn is bidding to pioneer an important new idea for the management of public services generally.  But he is wrong to limit the idea to a small number of Foundation Hospitals - he should apply the principle to all hospitals...

Where do you stand?           back to top


Continue to
Home Footnote page...

 

 
 

...
  Inter

 
 


Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as it source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE