These are anguished eyes, deprived of quiet sleep and without any real understanding of surrounding circumstance. They are the eyes of Tony Blair.. They are acquiescing in the promotion of war, as an instrument of global management, by the United States....    

 

 

 

 
 



New
Living Diary
Index


Renewing participatory democracy

"Tame the Corporations!"

My Little Red Book

A New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the Left!

Bevan
Re-visited
 

Multiple Differential Uncertainty


Who am I? Biography 

 

     


0110  Make sure you have not missed the previous edition of LivePolitics  Check it out  
And the one before that?   
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 12
Saturday 22 March 2003


America
cannot afford war

As the troops move into Iraq, the awesome violence of war excludes us.  We are reduced to the status of helpless spectators.  My reaction is to use my analytical power, in every way I can, to face up to the realities of what is happening, and to confront the consequences.  My brainpower is all that I have.  And my attention is focusing on three sectors.  

First, what will the economic aftermath be?  We know little about the impact modern war upon an advanced consumer economy.
Second, what will the impact be, of disruption in the "Middle East" and the Muslim world?  The indications are ominous.
Third, what will be consequences be, for "the Left", and for the UK Labour Party?  Will these hostilities herald a realignment of the forces of Left and Right?  How should I react, as a member of the Labour Party?

My Party position - for dissident Labour Party members, these are difficult moments.  I set out my personal position here.


Europe, ahoy! 

I have just returned from Strasbourg (via Paris, where we spent last Saturday evening, in the earnest pursuit of political enlightenment...)   I led a group of Welsh Fabians to the opening day of the EU Parliamentary session, last Tuesday, 11 March.  Although I had attended, as a young man, the first Session of the United Nations in 1951 (held in Paris, before it was captured for New York, by the USA...) I was quite unprepared from the cavernous vacuity of the European Parliament.

Make no mistake - there are great political endeavours to be undertaken in this arena, at this level - for me, that is not in doubt - ADR, workers' rights, migration, the international welfare state, Third World debt relief, trade protection - these are all great political issues. But the "parliamentary" model is entirely inappropriate for this purpose.  It constitutes a massive institutional error. 

Radical change is essential.  It is not merely a matter of scale.  We must find new ways of doing European politics...

back to top


Today brings a new First - this is the first time I have brought you a classic Steve Bell cartoon, from The Guardian - see foot of page...


New American Century

Peter Kilfoyle, in his key Commons speech on Tuesday, referred to this website, the New American Century.

  • You owe it to yourself to click through to the Republican website New American Century  

  • PS I am profoundly suspicious of those who, by way of Realpolitik, seem to reinforce this Far-Right imperialist clap-trap by offering an intellectual rationale for it - one such thesis was the leader in last Saturday's Guardian by Gwyn Prins (who he?) - I say that the Cheney/Rumsfeld Republican Conspiracy, if not displaced or deflected, will bring the ruination of the American State, and come to threaten the impoverishment of its peoples. But there is no automaticity (as they now say in the UN) about its victory..

What do you think?  Drop me a line

back to top


"Old" Federalism..

My mailbag, on returning from Strasbourg, contained a missive from the Federal Union, which had been alerted to this website, and thought you might be interested.  Federal Union is an "old" political grouping, in that it dates from 1938, promoting the case ever since for the decentralisation of political power - check them out.  I understand their scepticism about the concentration of power in the nation state, and I certainly favour internal devolution within each state.  But I am not, on the other hand, "anti-Westminster".

  • I believe that the nation state has a great future before it

 back to top


Non-Executive Non-Sense

Sir Stanley Kalms is not a a nice man. This pillar of the Thatcher business establishment is a nasty snarling right-wing character, contemptuous of others and insensitive to those around him.  But I agree 100% with his onslaught on Derek Higgs and the strengthening non-Executive Directors.  When it comes to company law, Sir Stanley and I share this starting-point.


New voices of Europe

European politics changed last week.  The Brussels Commission had the idea of polling the entire European population last November, with a common set of political questions - about the role of America, and relations with Europe.  Suddenly, there emerged a remarkably coherent picture of European public opinion - and the European majority sees the United States as a danger to world peace, rather than as a force for good - check it out in The Guardian.

  • And I am convinced that we must do much more, to give reality to the European dimension.  In a parallel development, I argue for a new Europe-wide network
    of European Community Councils.

back to top


Criminalising Parents

These pantomime prosecutions continue, of parents with near-adult 15-year old children whom they cannot get to school: check out Guardian report.  It is vital that we reduce the school-leaving age again to 15, thus ensuring that any child over 14 is in school only by consent, not by coercion of law.  Huge gains would be made, in terms of school discipline and good order. The use of coercive laws against our children and their parents is counter-productive - Schools Wrongfully Coerce.

back to top


Other recent topics

  • Socialism inspires liberalism >>>
  • Salariat v. Proletariat >>>
  • The "Bomb Iraq" Song >>>
  • Could Iraq destroy Old America? >>>
  • Lord Carlile is not enough >>>
  • Blair's Flawed Morality >>>
  • My new Surveillance Charter >>>
  • Do "markets" work? >>>
  • Exaggerating terrorist risk >>>
  • Welsh Land Authority missing >>>
  • Radical Immigration Reform >>>
  • A Socialist MI5? >>>
  • Bribery by mangoes >>>
  • Migration: What to do >>>
  • Confidence is indivisible >>>
  • Human anxiety is normal >>>
  • Sex toys, lingerie = Capitalism >>>

And read my own Big Theory itself, at
Multiple Differential Uncertainty   
   back to top


Follow my August 2002 Russian Tour Diary, now unfolding in splendid technicolor - capacity problems have so far limited the scale of how much I can E-publish, but there is still plenty to read -


Special Footnote

I love the online newspapers, which are my access to the world - share them with me - click through to their Homepages from here -

 back to top

     

 

Where will
Labour take its stand?

Tony Blair is losing all sense of his connection with the Labour Party, tenuous though that always was.  And when he goes, the Party will be faced with the brutal challenge of re-grouping, of rallying to some other banner. 

Where should Labour take its stand?  The status quo ante (as they say, in legal circles) is not an option.  Old Labour really did run out of steam, with the Kinnock defeat. The Old Marxist Left has nothing to offer.  Tribune, Red Pepper, SWP, Tony Benn, the TU leadership - none of them has two good ideas to rub together. The barren, negative, "anti-capitalist" forces behind the StoptheWar Coalition have no convincing forward agenda. Liberal democracy is a busted flush, throughout Europe.  So is the murkier option, Christian Democracy...

  • I shall be raising a new
    Liberal Socialist banner...

     back to top


What
Liberal Socialism
means to me..

Is a new focus thinkable, for the Labour Party?

My answer is YES.  A deliberate move is needed to establish common ground between traditional socialist perceptions and the human rights agenda, informed by a deep respect for the sovereignty of the human spirit and a common perception of the primacy of social institutions. 

 


Liberal Socialism 
your first responses

Your responses to my thoughts about “liberal socialism” have been most informative – keep them coming!  I have analysed with some care the first three responses (ages 26,32 and 52)


It’s my Party, I can
try
if I want to…

The Labour Party is dwindling numerically, down from its 440,000 peak at the time of the 1997 General Election. As part of a new liberal socialist perspective, the Labour Party would however undergo significant constitutional change. 

That is because the Party has been hi-jacked by its professionals, the salaried Party officers, its Members of Parliament, MEPs, Assembly members and Cabinet Councillors, and its Lords and Ladies – that is, the new political salariat.  A liberal socialist Labour Party would seek to reinvigorate membership participation, by changing the balance of power between the Party and its salaried representatives and managers. 


Wanton destruction
of industrial assets

 Should any company be entitled to destroy the productive capacity of any community?  That is the question posed by the Corus dilemma - that is, the close-down of UK steel plants by a Belgian company Board...  In my view, company law should be reformed to permit the Courts to challenge the reasonableness of any such wanton destruction.  Check out my radical agenda for -

  • Taming the Corporations...

back to top


US companies
take a Buffetting

I have found a new ally in the cause of radical company law reform.  None other than my namesake Warren Buffett, the arch guru of US investment, the Sage of Omaha.  WB is the ultimate "active shareholder", and he wants American shareholders to intervene more often to prevent the abuse of power and position by fat-cat Company Directors: read Julia Finch in The Guardian. 

Without radical changes in company law, however, he is whistling in the wind.  He should sign up to my Newport Manifesto -

  • Tame the Corporations!

back to top


Democratic
pioneering

Details have now been published of Alan Milburn's proposals for new elected Boards to run our hospitals. In my view, the Labour Backbench revolt on this issue is wrongly focused, although I do acknowledge the depth of their concern.  Like them, I consider it essential that the private-profit motive should not be unleashed in the NHS. 

But this is an initiative with great democratic potential, creating new options for the involvement of local people in running their local institutions.  O am sad that the Welsh Assembly Government seems to have set the face of Welsh Labour against this initiative. I gave you my views, way back last November, and they have not changed. 

back to top


New Dimensions
of Democracy

I am satisfied that the innovative impetus has gone out of "representative" democracy. Its impetus has run its course. Its political authority is being sapped by the salarisation of the representatives.

Elective, representative, democracy is not enough.  Government by the people needs to be reasserted, in a new wave of institutional innovation. My 1996 constitutional analysis still stands, even if the language now sounds a little old-dated, post-Celtic devolution -

back to top


A mile too far..

The hapless White House spokesman got his Biblical quotation seriously wrong. "The President will go the very last mile, in search for peace", he burbled.  It was a telling mistake - surprising, though, for a Bible-thumping Administration.  For the expression "You should go the extra mile..." comes from the Sermon on the Mount. 

  • Jesus was stressing the importance of not accepting coercion, of overcoming the use of force by the deployment of non-violence, by willing compliance.  Jesus knew that his listeners were familiar with the requisitioning powers of the Roman soldiers, who were entitled by law to require any citizen to assist them by carrying material for one mile. 

So Jesus said "If you are required by a soldier to go with him one mile, go with him two..".  That would trump the soldier's use of force and demonstrate the Christian's assertion of non-violence over coercion.  That became, over the years, "the extra mile"...  There is no such thing as "the last mile..."

  • It seems that my own early Chapel education may have been more effective than the daily prayer-meetings, now held for the White House staff...

back to top


Diary 2002

Now up to date!  I have re-structured my Diary to give you a day-to-day means of looking back, throughout the year just click through

back to top


New Discussion Group  Let's experiment with a bit more interactivity (as they say...) - you can now make your own contribution to any political debate - try the new JoinWarrenEvans Discussion Group.


Try BBC News - the public service website


Week 12
Saturday 22 March 2003

 

 
                     
  Steve Bell on Tony Blair and Jacques ChiracOne of the great pleasures of surfing the Net is to be able to  revert to great cartoons - just to browse at will through the creativity and wit of Steve Bell - I am relying on the good sense of the Guardian to go easy on the damages claims for breach of copyright - I shall plead that the damages should be minimal, and that they should be abated by the simple fact that you will now simply be unable to resist clicking through to check out his other drawings...
Back to Text
 
 

 
Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE