You are in the company of Roger Warren Evans, Welsh socialist lawyer and company director, on a journey to work out a new socialist order capable of generating equality and freedom for the world.  Nothing less will do.
   

   < Back to Home Page  
 



New
Living Diary
Index


Renewing participatory democracy

My Little Red Book

A New Socialist Settlement

Bevan
Re-visited
 

Multiple Differential Uncertainty


Who am I? Biography  

 

      0158  Make sure you have not missed
the previous edition 
Check it out   
And the one before that?   
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 9   Monday
23 February 2004


I apologise.  I hate being late with my web-editing, when so many of you make a point of checking-in on Monday mornings.  But having spent most of Sunday travelling to and fro Manchester, to take part in BBC1's Heaven & Earth Show, I have had no time to complete the web-editing of the new Monday Edition.

It was this website that put me on The Show, because the BBC researchers picked up my recent thoughts about David Goodhart and Pickling Culture.  I find it interesting to see how ideas percolate around - in this increasingly Web-intensive world.


One-Stop Nightmare

I distrust “One Stop Shops”.  The latest idea comes from Sir Peter Gershon, the Government-retained business guru who has come up with £16bn-worth of savings in the running of public services. 

Many of his ideas are sound.  Public service procurement could be greatly improved.   His challenge to the ethos of “regulation” is sound: as a socialist, I argue that it often reflects sloppy thinking about the true nature of public service.  More auxiliaries and paraprofessionals should be introduced to public service functions, making better use of trained personnel, notably in education and policing.  And Government should adopt a single Means Test, valid for all purposes.  All these ideas are sensible.

But his proposal is barmy, to convert Jobcentres into “one-stop shops” for all citizens of working-age in their relations with the State.  Certainly, we all now have complex relations with “the State”, and their management is certainly a vital issue – with which socialists should be in particular concerned.  But we should all have multiple opportunities of managing those relations.  We must have choice in that relationship, diversity.  The idea of giving the task to one team of civil servants is absurd – what happens when a one-stop shop comes to a stop?  By incompetence, or internal dissension, inadequate funding or industrial dispute?  What happens to the citizen then?

  • We would do better to invest in better communications all-round, and welcome multiple sourcing.


Congestion Charge misconceived

I am delighted that Ken Livingstone has had such success with his "Congestion Charge" in London.  Other cities are seeking to follow his example, and his CREEM (Campaign to Re-Elect the Mayor) builds mightily upon it.  But its significance does not simply lie in the management of local traffic jams.  Far more important: it serves as a dry-run  for the national Daily Usage Charge for which I have been campaigning since 1997...  If the entire Queen's Highway were brought into the scheme, it would work like a dream, without the tensions of partial implementation, and if a cheaper collection system were used, it would be a major source of UK tax income, for the Treasury.

 


Right policy
Wrong philosophy

New Labour has generated one jargon term which I find convincing.  It is “narrative”.  Parties, and Party policies, the pundits argue, “must have a narrative”.

I agreeNarratives matter.  The 2005 General Election will be fought on narratives.  Politicians have a heavy duty to simplify the bewildering complexities of the political environment, and to produce a convincing “narrative”, for those having to cast their electoral votes.  Michael Howard and Oliver Letwin are busy trying to construct a new Tory narrative.  Charles Kennedy has always muddled along without a narrative.  And Downing Street has clearly decided that the third-term Labour narrative will be “the New Localism”.  The big story will be the dispersal of power, devolution, delegation, localism.   

Now – I agree with that narrative.  It's a good narrative.  I welcome all the early indications of a Government intention to disperse and share power.   

back to top


Quest for Questors

My timetable this week includes a visit to Exeter, to meet with the National Association of Paralegals - this is their logo.  They work to develop the institutional structure of the mainstream legal system.  They mirror, for the legal profession, some of the supporting functions which are common features of the medical world.

The subject for debate will be my scheme for a new advocates' profession comprising non-lawyers - informed citizens qualified and willing to help their fellows to find their way about the systems of modern society, complete forms, write letters, make applications.  The new profession would build on the experience of the Citizens Advice Bureaux, and the trade unions.  It seems, though, that I shall have problems if I use the term "public advocate".

(NB You may then have to scroll down, to find this)


New Migration Data

In recent years, a nasty rightwing unit MigrationWatch UK, purporting to mobilise the legitimacy of "Oxford University", has commanded far too much media attention. 

I welcome the formation of a new Information Centre about Asylum and Refugees (ICAR) based at Kings College London (their logo, above).  ICAR is committed to provision of unbiased information on current asylum and immigration issues. 

That balance is sorely needed.

back to top


“Enforcement”
is not enough

On all sides, there is mounting concern about deceit and fraud in the business sector.  The headline corporate scandals are only the tip of a fearsome and deceitful iceberg.  And the costs of after-the-event “enforcement” are escalating: the City’s Financial Services Authority has just announced that it will be increasing its 2004 enforcement budget. 

This conventional “policing” approach is bound to fail.  Too many horses are regularly permitted to leave the stable, quietly and unobtrusively, before the doors can be bolted.  Tinkering will not do - what is needed is a radical change of system. The only long-term remedy is greater transparency, greater openness.   

We must open up to media and public scrutiny the widest possible range of company books and records.  There is no alternative to the fresh air of public scrutiny.  These great corporate “affairs of state” are far too important to be allowed to remain in the shadows of the “private property” sector.  The secretive, collusive, conspiratorial style of the corporate sector must be radically transformed, by new legislation forcing all major companies to open their books, and answer to the public for their decisions. 


Naether's Letter
from Llanelli

I love receiving your letters, triggered by this website - they bring alive the many different lives reflected in the readership of this richest of media. You will, like me, be moved and impressed with this letter from Robert Naether of Llanelli, home of the mighty Scarlets.  He has a very distinctive story to tell..

back to top


Go Federal

Everywhere one turns, the federal challenge is becoming more pointed.  Northern Ireland is, at base, a problem of federalism – how to retain a disparate province within a unitary “State” framework.  In Wales, the Richards Commission will soon publish its conclusions, addressing similar issues. The elected regional assemblies of England will pose new federal issues, as will the continued success of Ken Livingstone in London. 

But we are not alone.  France has Corsica, which screams out for a satisfactory federal solution.  Chechnya, within Russia, will be accommodated only by way of an imaginative federal solution.  In Iraq, the search is for a federal formula which can accommodate the political aspirations of three deeply divided “interests”.  The South African state is underpinned by a range of imaginative federal features.  Germany, Canada, Australia and the United States are already practised in the ways of federalism.  The European Union is searching for a new workable federal solution, to accommodate the ten states due to accede on 1 May.   

Federalism is about the integration of competing sovereignties, competing democratic mandates.  It is about sharing the cake of political power.  Faced with the demands of growing political and commercial integration, the 6,000m inhabitants of this small globe have no option. 

  • We are all federalists now.

back to top


back to top


Special Footnote

I love the online newspapers, which are my access to the world - share them with me - click through to their here -  I have added the English-language China Daily ... and I now offer you the leading English-language Indian paper The Hindu. 

They are all just a click away.

back to top



One year ago

We are hurtling through the year - and my cross-check on 2003 seems to throw up more and more about the Iraq War.  But I will try and give you a flavour of what else I was thinking about, in February 2003 - when Robin Cook was still Leader of the House of Commons...

House of Lords Reform

Return to my "Old School"

Regulating electronic surveillance

Exaggerating risks of terrorism

City dynamism ignored

back to top


Having discovered this remarkable NASA website, linked with the Hubble Telescope and the NASA Mars exploration vehicles, with its current photographs from outer space, I am reluctant to let it go

back to top

     

Dear Friends

This Monday 23 February, seven Doctors from the Stapleford Clinic are to appear before their professional body, the General Medical Council on charges arising out the treatments they offer for drug users, in particular heroin.   Please join us, to demonstrate in their support.

Come to the GMC from 0930h onwards

44 Hallam Street 
London, W1W 6JJ

Underground:  Goodge Street, Warren Street, Regent’s Park, and Great Portland Street

This is an attack upon the human rights and fundamental freedoms of the Stapleford Clinic patients. These patients, if the Clinic is closed down (and that is the intention of the Authorities) will find themselves in a horrendous situation. Their very health and lives will be threatened. Many patients will simply not be able to “manage” the drastic reductions of maintenance prescriptions that have hitherto kept them stable and away from crime.

These “charges” are brought by the Home Office, for breaches of their prescribing rules. They are part of a greater plan by the
Action against Drugs team of the Home Office to eradicate private clinics and other Doctors who offer treatment, realising  realise that some people will simply not manage to detoxify. People who say that punishment and enforced treatment (the alternative to private treatment) are being naive beyond belief. They only have to look at the facts.  Drug addiction has only a 5% cure rate, as for the rest, they become chronic users and recidivists.

A grave wrong is being planned, an assault upon hundreds of private patients currently receiving satisfactory addicition treatment, under medical supervision.
This wrong must be prevented.  Join us at 44 Hallam Street on Monday morning, to uphold the patients’ cause.

PS  On another matter, Richard Brunstrom Chief Constable of North Wales has kindly sent his report to us "Time for change?" It is brilliant and can be found on www.north-wales.police.uk

Best wishes - and "Be There"!

Reverend John and Adrian Garfoot

Billy Bragg and I

Billy Bragg has come up with a new idea for elections to the House of Lords.  I did the same last year, searching for a compromise position, moving away fr9om my commitment to total abolition.  We have both suggested that Lords Elections should draw on precisely that same “legitimacy pool” as the Commons, using the same election results.

Bragg argued using the Constituency votes-cast to re-constitute “regions” (including Wales and Scotland) and then allocate Lords seats from Party Lists according to the resulting percentages.

I argued on a wider front for doubling the number of elected representatives, electing one man and one woman for each Constituency, thus 1320 “elected members” in all.  I would then allow the Parties to assign their winning candidates over the three major chambers – Commons, Lords and Strasbourg, in their Commons proportions.  The totals for the Commons and Strasbourg would be fixed, with the remainder serving in the Lords, as a revising Chamber.  All “elected members” would have the same legitimacy, and their success within the Party systems would determine their progress up the slippery pole, as at present. 

  • Bragg has won the right to put his views to a Fabian meeting to be held at the Commons next Wednesday 25 February, I will report back to you. 


Forced
to advocate

Last week, I was required by harsh circumstance to "represent" a "Client", in proceedings in "Court".  Not legally, you understand, because I am no longer a practising lawyer.  But I was pitch-forked, by local circumstance, into assisting an Iraqi asylum-seeker to present his appeal case, as a "McKenzie Friend", before a Home Office Adjudicator.

  • But the circumstances should never have arisen. This man was betrayed by "the system".  He should have been legally represented.

back to top


Why increase
the price of money?

The price of money remains low in the United States ("Bank Rate" =1%), and the Authorities are not planning any increase.  In the UK it is four times as high (4%), and the Bank of England is planning to increase it further.  The Bank of England claims to be "managing inflation" by increasing interest-rates - but I do not find that rationale convincing.  Can that be the whole story?

"Interest" is merely the price of money, or the remuneration paid to the owners of capital - for doing nothing more than owning it.  I suspect that the true motive of the Bank of England, seeing a thriving economy, is merely to grab a larger slice of the economic cake for the owners of capital...  UK authorities have always been more "pro-capitalist" than either Europe or the USA - that is the foundation of London's preeminent position as a financial centre.

  • Is the Bank of England not simply rewarding the capitalists?  Or do
    you know different? 

    Drop me a line


Pensions 
Wrong track for Labour

I continue to be mortified by my Party's failure to get to grips with the old age pension crisis.  Labour's puny new Pensions Bill, merely creating mandatory insurance for occupational pensions, is a mere fig-leaf, a diversionary tactic - a political non-event.  It is shaming that the Tories have the better policy, of increasing the basic state pension - even though that does not go far enough, by a very long way.  The Observer's main leader captures the truth..

back to top


Mandelson
has no right...

... to lecture the Labour Party on "moving on", "putting Iraq behind us", "closing ranks".  We are confronted with an issue of political morality, and he has no moral authority.  Our Government has been responsible for colluding in one of the most dangerous and destructive acts of aggression that the world has seen for decades. The threatening clouds of Middle East conflict are still building up as a result.  That cannot be allowed simply to "rest there".

If Blair would admit that the Iraq invasion was an error of judgment, we could perhaps as a nation "move on".  We could work to re-assert the authority of consensus, and of the UN, rather than reinforce the doctrines of unilateral thuggery which Labour has now espoused. 

  • But I fear he will not.  And if
    he will not, Blair must be persuaded to give way to others who can find
    a way of changing course. 

back to top


Extraterritoriality
rules OK...

A word of warning.  I shall be seeking, increasingly, to raise with you issues of "extraterritoriality".  The term refers to the assertion of a state's jurisdiction outside the limits of that state's territory.  It has nothing to do with Daleks or other creations from outer space - they're extraterrestrial.  And it is all because the consequences of the French Revolution (and this man Montesquieu) are still being worked out...

Our increasingly integrated
globe is raising new questions of extraterritoriality all the time.  And they are particularly difficult for English lawyers and politicians to handle.  For English law, unlike American law, has consistently resisted doctrines of extraterritoriality, and certainly avoided creating such jurisdictions.


Left Activists' Corner

I have three moderately-left political projects to engage your interest, in 2004 - nothing too revolutionary, you understand - and by the way, February's new Royal Mail stamps (First Class only) are now on sale - a light touch, after the dismal railway stamps, last month...

(a) Company Reform Coalition targeting a major Easter pow-wow in London;

(b) Public Advocates - the birth of a new profession, group also to hold its first London meeting in March;

(c) Labour Links, seeking to unlock the resources of the Labour Party - and I seek the opportunity to speak to Party groups about Party reform

  • Let me know what you think    

back to top


Surfing my Diary

For the first time in the two-year history of this Weblog, my diary was 100% up to date,  at Christmas!  'Twas a big effort, over the break, but you can now browse back over the entire 24-month period just click through


Never miss Steve Bell!  His cartoons, from The Guardian - his wit and perception illuminate the absurdities of the political scene...

back to top


Recent topics

Territorial State v Membership State >>>

Extending the Welfare State >>>

Greg Dyke was to blame >>>

In defence of the BBC >>> 

Not New Business - "Foraging" >>>

What is the meaning of "Risk"? >>>

GMB loses campaigning zest >>>

Government - new Iraq "Defence" >>>

"Culture" is a dangerous concept >>>

Speed Bumps - legal cock-up! >>>

 

And read my Big Theory itself, at Multiple Differential Uncertainty...

Or try my snappier and more practical analysis of the Corporations and the Left Coming to Terms

back to top



I enjoy dipping into informed US West Coast chat, always up to the minute, which can be found at www.metafilter.com.

 


0158  Make sure you have not missed
the previous edition  Check it out   
And the one before that?   
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 9   Monday
23 February 2004

 

back to top

 

 
   

 

 
 

 
Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE