You are in the company of Roger Warren Evans, Welsh socialist lawyer and company director, on a journey to work out a new socialist order capable of generating equality and freedom for the world.  Nothing less will do.
   

   < Back to Home Page  
 



New
Living Diary
Index




Renewing participatory democracy

My Little Red Book

A New Socialist Settlement

Bevan
Re-visited
 

Multiple Differential Uncertainty


Who am I? Biography  

 

      040301  Make sure you have not missed
the previous edition  Check it out   
And the one before that?   
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 10  Sunday
7 March 2004


STOP PRESS  I have just installed an in-board Search Engine for you, right here at your left, just for this website - I am finding it useful myself, to navigate the last two-and-a-half years since I started weblogging - have fun!

STOP STOP PRESS For Web enthusiasts, let me report that the total hits for the 29-day February just fell short of the 31-day January - so it's level-pegging for the website, I would say - thanks for your continuing support...

October     1184
November  1228
December  1116 
January     1267
February    1223


The genetic engineering of plants continues to generate huge debate and disagreement.  The ridiculous term “Frankenstein foods” has been coined to discredit the GM case.  Readers will know that I am actively concerned about the adverse legal and political implications of extending private property power into the plant world.  I recognise that the GM revolution carries with it, through the byways of patent and registered varieties laws, potential for the abuse of power on a massive scale. 

But I do not fear the phenomenon of genetic modification itself.  I do not think "monsters" will arise.  I commend to you the Guardian article by Lord (Dick) Taverne, Chairman of the Sense about Science group.  

I find no grounds whatever for the “Frankenstein food”-type of attack.  I cannot take Friends of the Earth seriously, on this matter.  I simply do not believe that life is threatened in any way by these changes themselves.  Taverne throws new light on the scale of GM crop-production in China and India and the remainder of the Far East, as well as huge productivity gains achieved in Africa.   

My position is, I suspect, essentially a religious one.  My optimism, and my perspective upon life, is hidden away - deep in my value system.   


Why is Blair so fussed..
   ... about Clare Short?

I know precisely why.  My perspective is also that of a barrister.  And Tony Blair is, first and foremost, a barrister presenting a case.  As a man with few political convictions, it is the adoption of a "case to argue" which gives him a framework - for his personality, and the conduct of his life.  We all need that.

But for a lawyer, that framework comes at a price.  And the price is this: you must take the law seriously, very seriously.  Legality matters, illegality matters.  They certainly matter to Blair - although not to Bush, whose personality is otherwise configured.  It mattered desperately to Blair that the attack on Iraq should be legal.

And he knew, in the closing weeks of 2002, that it was only a new UN Resolution which could "deliver" that legality. 

The 1991 Resolution offered only a fragile legal basis, unconvincing.  And the only other argument was that the UK was responding to an "imminent threat" to its interests and national security. And given Saddam's manifest weaknesses, that was bound to be difficult to prove. 

No - once the UN campaign was lost - effectively in Kofi Annan's office, where much of the politickin' will have occurred - Blair will have known that he was up the creek of history without a paddle. 

That is why he reacted so violently, and petulantly, to Clare Short's revelation about the bugging of Annan's office.  She took him back to the real turning-point, in Blair's War.  For that occurred - precisely in Kofi Annan's New York Office.

Defeated in New York, Blair made the best of it, ambivalently switching between both the  "legality" arguments available to him, always riding both horses. His capacity for self-persuasion, if not self-delusion, is legendary.  But once the UN campaign had failed, he was always onto a loser.

  • I believe that he reached that conclusion, as soon as the UN spat was over..  His instincts as a barrister will have told him so.  We are trained, we barristers, to spot losing arguments, as well as winning ones...


Airport Theory

The David Goodhart debate about Britishness rumbles on, sadly fuelled by the out-of-office John Denham. Many decent folk are being drawn in to its covert prejudices.  The Guardian cites the modern Premiership football team as a reflection of underlying views, where team loyalty outweighs the players' diverse nationalities.

"Perhaps these football clubs are a new model for the modern state".

Wrong.  The right model for the modern state is Heathrow Airport. 

back to top


Right topic
wrong touch

Blair is right to call for greater imagination, and greater flexibility, from the Home Civil Service.  He is entitled to castigate the old MAFF for its disastrous performance during the Foot-and-Mouth outbreak, and for its being out-managed by the Army.  His major speech this week on Civil Service reform is well focused, well targeted. 

But in delivering his message, and in spelling out its practical implications, his fabled “touch” has let him down.   I have served as an old-style Under-Secretary myself, and I do understand his desire to induce a stronger sense of innovation, of drive, of energy – of an entire “can do” philosophy – into the senior Civil Service.  That ambition is entirely legitimate. 


EU "Immigration"
Can Blunkett be right?

Well, YES...  It was Lord (Chris) Haskins who said “You have to watch David Blunkett: he does awful things, then suddenly out of the blue, he gets something right!”

That has happened this time.   In January, the UK faced progressive betrayal on EU enlargement by thirteen other EU states, many of whom caved in to popular xenophobia over the year-end.  They left UK and Ireland with the only states with “open doors”, and that dramatically changed immigration forecasts for EU enlargement on 1 May. 

The Tories shamelessly exploited the real dilemma faced by the Government, in ways which confirmed my worst fears about Michael Howard.  And the Government, I accept, simply had to take action. 

Blunkett’s compromise is a good one - but it is undoubtedly weak in parts.  And those weaknesses will come back to haunt us.

back to top


Filofax DECEIT

Filofax users are used to being exploited.  The astronomical prices charged for Filofax "accessories" have always been a stain upon the good name of the business sector.  But now Filofax is resorting to deliberate deceit.  Consider this "page...

It looks like the presentation common to other Filofax products.  A cellophane pack carries the dark-blue "flash", wrapped around the product itself, which shows clearly through the cellophane.   Or does it?

No it does not. This is a special cardboard "imitation" page, designed and printed to look just like the other Filofax on-shelf presentations.  Even imitation punch-holes are included, cunningly camouflaged and printed to look as if they are being viewed through the cellophane.  Two of these heavier pieces of cardboard are included, front and back, within the cellophane package. 

The effect is to give the slim pack a very substantial "feel", of thickness, therefore of quantity - concealing the fact that there are just 25 thin sheets of A5 paper within it.  The volume of the package is doubled by this useless cardboard, sold for £2.  That is the equivalent of 16p for an A4 sheet of paper. 

But the actual number of sheets is not even shown on the outside of the pack.  So you cannot check arithmetically, you can only feel.  But in feeling the weight of the package, you are being most grievously deceived.

  • These Filofax techniques are a disgrace, and ought to be exposed.

back to top


Special Footnote

I love the online newspapers, which are my access to the world - share them with me - click through to their here -  I have added the English-language China Daily ... and I now offer you the leading English-language Indian paper The Hindu. 

They are all just a click away.

back to top


One year ago

We are hurtling through the year - and my cross-check on 2003 seems to throw up more and more about the Iraq War.  But I will try and give you a flavour of what else I was thinking about, in February 2003 - when Robin Cook was still Leader of the House of Commons...

House of Lords Reform

Return to my "Old School"

Regulating electronic surveillance

Exaggerating risks of terrorism

City dynamism ignored

back to top


I enjoy dipping into informed US West Coast chat, always up to the minute, which can be found at www.metafilter.com.


Having discovered this remarkable NASA website, linked with the Hubble Telescope and the NASA Mars exploration vehicles, with its current photographs from outer space, I am reluctant to let it go

back to top


     

Progressive
self-delusion

Tony Blair has sent me a letter.  Every E-enrolled Labour Party member has received a copy of the full text of Blair’s Sedgefield speech putting forward his new defence of intervention in Iraq.  And it comes with a rambling covering letter of great length, repeating much of the Speech.   I invite you to read the full speech.

He advances Theory Number Four, namely that unilateral military intervention can be justified on humanitarian grounds (although he denies attacking Iraq for that reason…).  The speech is well-intentioned, and serious.  But it is also rambling, unbalanced, and incoherent.  I believe that Blair's Messianic self-delusion has reached an advanced stage, and that his judgment has been adversely affected.


Lord Sainsbury says...

Please forgive a little blowing of the own trumpet, but it has just been brought to my attention that, in the House of Lords in on 8th January, Lord Sainsbury acknowledged my role in generating the idea of community interest companies.  In introducing the Second Reading debate, he said -

"The idea drew on earlier work by several people and groups, including Stephen Lloyd, Roger Warren Evans, the Charity Law Association and others."

My thanks to David Sainsbury (my former boss, of course, and Labour Party colleague, before the SDP...) for that handsome acknowledgment.


MindThe Gap”! 

Have you understood the game that is being played in Iraq, by the US and the UK?  Have you grasped the significance of the gap that will be left between the “transfer of sovereignty” to a puppet Iraqi Government (on 30 June 2004) and the holding of elections (perhaps early 2005)

back to top


My triple
whammy...

Billy Bragg has come up with a new idea for elections to the House of Lords.  General Election votes would be counted in two different ways - once for the Commons and a second-time for the Lords.   

My own solution is more radical. The voters would pick two representatives per constituency (one man, one woman) and they would be assigned to (a) the Commons, (b) the Second Chamber and (c) European Parliament.  All "MPs" would enjoy equal electoral legitimacy. The outright winner in each Constituency would of course go to the Commons, and the Parties would pick the two remaining teams from their elected squads. This would solve three of the worst problems of our current system, in a triple whammy...


Trade Union Inspiration

My own union GMB, has adopted the most uninspiring slogan imaginable - "Experts in the world of work".  USDAW, on the other hand, for the retail sector, wins my accolade, for retaining some of the inspiration of a campaigning union movement.  Their slogan is Freedom from Fear – that’s more like it!  

  • There are huge challenges facing the TU movement, political and industrial.  But they will not be met by desk-bound “experts”.  GMB must try harder...

back to top


Fatcat Remuneration 
No Action

Patricia Hewitt has annoyed the Unions by refusing to intervene to limit Board and executive remuneration.  She has been sitting on the fence for two years, and now she has decided to do nothing.

Hewitt is right to reject direct State intervention in corporate reward packages.  Incomes policy is a broken political reed, whether on the shop-floor or in the Boardroom.  And Hewitt is right to look to shareholders to discipline corporate management.

But Hewitt is wrong to leave shareholders with so few powers, when faced with rapacious and devious executives.  Government intervention is needed, to strengthen shareholders, on a much broader front.

back to top


Deceit is endemic

Will the "retail" financial services industry ever be honest enough to be allowed to trade?  I am beginning to doubt it.  The arcane wording of all "financial instruments" will always be liable to misunderstanding, disappointment and deceit.  I am beginning to doubt whether ordinary private companies will ever prove to be reliable enough to look after the savings of ordinary people. 

Deceit and dishonesty are endemic to the financial services sector.  No attempts at statutory regulation have yet been successful.  Maybe the only course is for the State to become the repository-of-last-resort for ordinary "retail" savings, giving some minimal guarantee of security. 

  • I suspect that the only acceptable long-term solution will turn out to be a socialist one...

Thanks to The Guardian, for the cartoon


Asylum
Adjudication Wrongs

Footnote   I should report that justice came a little nearer, for the Iranian dissident seeking asylum, whom I was forced to "represent" at a hearing in Pontypool last Friday.  The Adjudicator was equally concerned at the difficulties he had experienced in finding a Solicitor.   Acting as his "Next Friend" in the absence of a Solicitor, I managed to get a second adjournment of the hearing, until early April.

  • That will give him time to brief London Solicitors, and get the necessary certified statements from the leadership of the Baluchistan National Front, so vital to his case of political persecution.  His Party colleagues have met up with him, and are arranging legal representation. So I felt I had done a good day's work...

back to top


Did you know...?

If a picture is worth a thousand words, how about this picture?

These are official Government statistics.  Methadone kills many more people than heroin, so does paracetamol.  Ecstasy deaths are a tiny figure.  And just look at the ravages of the "legal" drugs, alcohol (wine-coloured) and tobacco (light blue smoke-coloured...)

PS  Richard Brunstrom the courageous Chief Constable of North Wales has published his great drugs-reform report "Time for change?" on the Police website at www.north-wales.police.uk

back to top


Left Activists' Corner

I have three moderately-left political projects to engage your interest, in 2004 - nothing too revolutionary, you understand - and by the way, February's new Royal Mail stamps (First Class only) are now on sale - a light touch, after the dismal railway stamps, last month...

(a) Company Reform Coalition targeting a major Easter pow-wow in London;

(b) Questors - the birth of a new profession, group planning expansion;

(c) Labour Links, seeking to unlock the resources of the Labour Party - and I seek the opportunity to speak to Party groups about Party reform

  • Let me know what you think    

back to top


Surfing my Diary

For the first time in the two-year history of this Weblog, my diary was 100% up to date,  at Christmas!  'Twas a big effort, over the break, but you can now browse back over the entire 24-month period just click through


Never miss Steve Bell!  His cartoons, from The Guardian - his wit and perception illuminate the absurdities of the political scene...

back to top


Recent topics

Extending the Welfare State >>>

Greg Dyke was to blame >>>

GMB loses campaigning zest >>>

"Culture" is a dangerous concept >>>

Speed Bumps - legal cock-up! >>>

We are all Federalists now >>>

"Localism" for the wrong reason >>>

Asylum: Inadequate legal aid >>>

Territorial v Membership States >>>

Filofax Deceit >>>

And read my Big Theory itself, at Multiple Differential Uncertainty...

Or try my snappier and more practical analysis of the Corporations and the Left Coming to Terms



040301  Make sure you have not missed
the previous edition  Check it out   
And the one before that?   
Other recent topics highlighted here

Week 10  Sunday
7 March 2004

 
   

 

 
 

 
Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE