|
Sheffield
22
March 2004
This date and place will go down in
political history. For on this day there arrived in
Sheffield the first of a new category of refugee. I
applaud the Government's move to accept for UK
settlement a number of refugees (just 500, in this first year)
whose refugee-status has been determined by the United Nations itself (UNHCR) -
and not by the UK at all.
This is how it should be
done, in the longer-term. The UN should investigate
and determine refugee-status, with every UN member undertaking to accept its fair
proportion of the total, for settlement. Having become closely
involved of late with the UK asylum-appeal process, I am keenly aware of its
inadequacy. I am convinced that UN
tribunals should be encouraged to develop specialist skills in making
the asylum-decisions, country-by-country, and then negotiating with host
countries for the appropriate reception of confirmed refugees.
Planning more
housing
It
looks as if the Government is girding its loins to “do something” about the
parlous housing situation. They clearly plan to enter the next Election
with a can-do agenda for
housing. But do they know what to do?
This
is my very own subject,
my having spent 1974/77 as Industrial Adviser
on Construction (much of which related to
house-production) to the Wilson/Callaghan Government. And I am sad
that the Government seems to have learnt so little from our earlier
experience.
For
the “housing problem” is an amalgam of several different problems, largely
unrelated. There are at least six,
and each will need separate treatment.
Hold onto your hats – because
each one of these will require you to address quite different ishoos…
-
Size of
total housing stock
-
Housing
Land Supply
-
Servicing land “for housing”
-
Rising
house-prices
-
Building of
housing for rent
-
Meeting special regional needs
The
task of bringing these together is massive, and difficult.
I know how to do it, because that was my job at the DoE,
under Tony Crosland. But I doubt if John Prescott, and the present
generation of civil servants, know where to start…
back
to top
Why I am LibSoc
not LibDem
Every Libdem Conference drives home for me the
differences which have held me in the Labour Party for over 40 years, even
though my political journey began (as for so many Welsh) in a
Liberal household. For me, the LibDems have always failed to articulate the
case for the primary collective,
redistributive functions of Government. The mandatory
redistribution of wealth by Government, throughout a thousand different
channels, constitutes the cornerstone of our civic order,
however tattered it may currently seem.
The tragedy of New Labour
is that it has lost the liberal, individualist philosophy which
is the other side of the collectivist coin. Collectivism is
acceptable only if it is informed, in its implementation, by a profound
respect for every citizen, for human dignity and worth.
back
to top
We
should spend, not save
I
am indebted to Michael Howard, in the Budget Debate, for highlighting the
fall in personal savings. We are now saving just 5% of disposable income,
as compared with the longer-term UK rate of 10%-12%. We are now at the
long-term US savings-rate, which is 6%. For those on ordinary incomes,
the truth is that spending makes better sense than saving. The
much-vaunted institutions of market capitalism have shown themselves to be incapable of
managing small savings, unreliable custodians of personal savings.
back
to top
Iraq, Iraq…
With
the tawdry Iraq “Anniversary” last Saturday, and my failure to join the Iraq
March, I have been asked about my position now.
Having opposed the 2003 Iraq Invasion both for its illegality and its lack
of wisdom, I now have to face the Realpolitik of 2004.
back
to top
Lords must go!
There is, quite simply,
no solution to the Lords conundrum. It was to be
expected, albeit humiliating, that the Government would fail yet again to
find a compromise. And the issue is now to go to "appeal" - to the
Court of Public Opinion, at the next General Election. But what will
Labour tell the people?
The only acceptable way forward is outright
abolition of any second chamber, coupled with the radical reform of the House of
Commons. There
is no other acceptable political solution
to the Lords conundrum. Labour should ask the electorate to approve
straightforward abolition.
What about joining me, in a
Lords Must Go lobby?
Rescuing
Public Libraries
The
public library service is in crisis. Between 1992 and 2002, library
visits dropped by 17% and book loans dropped by 25%. Library book
issues went down, while the commercial bookstores increased their sales. LIBRI
is a registered charity working to support and extend
public library services in society, and will soon be launching a new
website at www.libri.org.uk
And
this week, libraries had their very own Lords debate, to which the
excellent Libraries Minister
Lord (Andrew) McIntosh replied...
For full Hansard
record click here
back
to top
Leave us alone
Is
Blair right? Did 11 September 2001 really change our world?
I don’t think it did. In my
view, the invasion of
Iraq
was far more significant than 9/11, because it unleashed the forces of
unilateral, global US interventionism.
Gentle Massage
by Human Rights Act
Some important cases never make the
headlines. And the adjudication by the House of Lords in the cases
of Colin Middleton and Sheena Creamer was not destined for the headlines,
although it was creditably picked up by
The Guardian.
Both had committed suicide, in separate incidents, while in jail - and the
issue before the Lords related to the scope of of the inquest juries' findings.
- Hardly
headline-gripping stuff! But the Lords judgment
demonstrated clearly how the leavening effect of the Human Rights
Act 1998 is working its way, slowly but surely, through
our
Constitution, and our society.
back
to top
Recent
topics
Extending
the Welfare State
>>>
Territorial v Membership States
>>>
EU migration socialist perspectives
>> One and
>> Two
Asylum: KEEP
Judicial Review >>>
Iraq the
critical July time-slot >>>
MPs
Select
TWO per Constituency
>>>
Community
Interest Companies
>>>
The Clousot
State >>>
Labour
improves Housing Benefit >>>
Child obesity could mean
anxiety
>>>
Injustice
at Cross Hands >>>
And read my Big Theory itself, at
Multiple Differential Uncertainty...
Or try my snappier
and more practical analysis of the Corporations and the Left
Coming to Terms
back
to top
I
enjoy dipping into informed US West Coast chat, always up to
the minute, which can be found at
www.metafilter.com.
040322
Make sure you have not missed
the previous edition
Check it out
And the one
before that?
Other recent topics
highlighted here
|