You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   


  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 
New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0060E  908, 909

908   12 January 2004  

Seeds of optimism

Even in dark times, optimism is possible.  This week, I have deliberately tried to turn away from the illiberal authoritarianism of current Western politics, and accentuate the positive. 

I think I can see better times ahead, the small green shoots of a more rational and peaceful world - even in the Middle East, even in Europe - and even in America.  I was encouraged in my optimism by Anatole Kaletsky, writing in the The Times last Thursday.  He highlighted the growing strengths of the Asian consumer market, and the driving aspirations of a new Asian middle-class, in both India and China.  And that (as he observed) "creates a preference for peace over war".

These are matters of the highest possible abstraction, difficult to grasp in written form.  The best I can do, in these intervals stolen from the currents of day, is to highlight the pluses and minuses of the situation in which we find ourselves...

Factors favouring pessimism

Major State Dominance - by which I mean to refer to the power structures of "big states", those which endow their leaders with illusions of omnipotence. The nation-state is an inherently oppressive institution, closely linked with the "armed-forces interest", concentrating and legitimising power in a few hands, all posing real threats to the sanity of their leaders and the security of its citizens.  Both the United States and the United Kingdom constitute such threats, as do the personalities of George Bush and Tony Blair.

The Armed Forces Interest - this is a deep-rooted element in human society, linking the modern arms industry with the professional military, and extending its tentacles throughout society, through much of professional Police establishment, to the ends of the British Legion and other former-service groups - it is informed by a lingering Hobbesian perception that all social order is ultimately underpinned by the judicious use of force, and it attracts all those in society (for the most part, male) preoccupied with the deployment of physical force.

Fundamentalism - the forces of "religion" are commonly blamed for generating the most destructive forms of fundamentalism, but many despots and dictators seek to generate near-religious commitment in their cause (Hitler, or Mussolini, or Mosley), and many of the deeper human emotions (particularly racism) seem to generate their own fundamentalist dimensions - these psycho-systems constitute a real threat to the future of mankind.

Human nastiness - a Christian theologian might call it "original sin" - it is clear that the human species, almost uniquely in the natural world, is capable of systematic and "evil" malfunction (Harold Shipman comes to mind, this week) - very powerful individuals have shown themselves capable of extreme cruelty and systematic exploitation, and the risk of such evil is ever-present - this is a positive drive

Human selfishness - this simple proposition cannot be ignored, for mankind has shown a distinctive self-centredness which, while no doubt a Darwinian asset, is also responsible for man's ability to batten down the horizons and ignore the hardships of others, dispense with altruism, ignore global degradation, and even the most awful crimes happening under our very noses.

Factors favouring optimism

Altruism - my observation of my fellow man is that we all have huge resources of altruism, a real sensitivity to the sufferings of others, even though social conventions may inhibit its expression

Corporations for peace -

Devolution, Political Dispersal -

 

 

Where do you figure, on the Pessimism Index?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


909  15 January  2004  

LAW BEFORE JUSTICE
Letter to the Worthing ARGUS

Dear Sir

I recently attended the sentencing of Chris Baldwin at Chichester Crown Court ("Pro-cannabis trader jailed", The Argus, January 10).  I was confused that Mr Baldwin was being sent to prison after what amounted to a glowing summation of his character.  The Judge described him as "honest", "sincere", with a "genuine belief in his medical need for cannabis after 30 years of suffering ... and honest commitment to try to persuade the Government to change the law".

He said the cannabis cafes managed by Mr Baldwin were run with strict rules
(age restrictions, no alcohol or hard drugs), caused no nuisance to locals and were politically-driven rather money-orientated.

Judge Sessions also referred to the other two co-defendants (Winston Matthews and Mark Benson) as sincere with a genuine belief in the medicinal value of cannabis for their pain.  They were given suspended sentences and curfew respectively.

However, Mr Baldwin was already on a suspended sentence for previous victimless cannabis offences and it seemed the Judge felt his hands were tied by the law - and that he was forced to bring that sentence into effect, although reducing it.

That just about sums up the case: the interests of the law are apparently
above the interests of the public and of justice.  How can it be just to send to prison an honest and sincere crippled man who not only has no victims to his so-called crimes, but has a massive amount of support from those in pain who he helped gain some relief beyond that provided by conventional pharmaceutical drugs?

There is something wrong, not only with the law against cannabis, but with the legal system in general when law comes before justice.

Alun Buffry

Norwich

What do you think?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page

 

 
 
 
 
   

Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE