You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   
  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 
New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0065B  952, 953

952   19 March 2004  

Rescuing
Public Libraries

The public library service is in crisis.  Between 1992 and 2002, library visits dropped by 17% and book loans dropped by 25%.  Library book issues went down, while the commercial bookstores increased their sales. LIBRI  is a registered charity working to support and extend public library services in society, and will soon be launching a new website at www.libri.org.uk

And this week, libraries had their very own Lords debate.  In that debate, Libraries Minister Lord (Andrew) McIntosh (Labour’s Leader of the GLC, before Ken Livingstone) laid bare some of the problems -

Expenditure on books averages only 9.6 per cent of total library budgets. It is also true that, as there is a decline…,  more money goes on administration and less on frontline services. That happens everywhere. We have to do something about that...  I am not convinced that we are getting the right deals out of publishers and booksellers on books, using our purchasing power.  I am certainly not convinced that we are doing the most economical thing. There is one study which shows that it costs as much to purchase and to index a book as it does to buy a book. That cannot be right. We have to find some way round that, and indeed we are actively doing so.”

These are fighting words from the Minister.  The LIBRI Trustees welcomed this week’s Lords debate – although as it was held on Budget Day, the spotlight of meeja attention was directed elsewhere. 

LIBRI will in April be publishing “Who’s in charge”, a pivotal new report on the public library service from bookseller and management consultant Tim Coates. 

And LIBRI will also be launching a new website at www.libri.org.uk

For full Hansard record click here

Where do you stand on public libraries?  Is their decline inevitable? Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


953   19 March 2004  

Leave us alone

Is Blair right?  Did 11 September 2001 really change our world? 

I don’t think it did.  In my view, the invasion of Iraq was far more significant than 9/11, because it unleashed the forces of unilateral, global US interventionism.   

Certainly, urban guerrilla tactics are much more sophisticated now than they have ever been, and in certain circles the practice of suicide-bombing is gaining ground.  Yet in terms of the ordinary person’s experience and perception of life, nothing has really changed.  Although the incidence of “terrorist” attacks seems to be increasing, and although religious fundamentalism seems to be strengthening, terrorist events are so infrequent and so limited in scope that they do not – and will never – affect the overwhelming majority of the global population. 

Death in a road-accident is much more likely, although a lightning-strike may be comparable. The personal experience of terrorism in 2004 is no more disruptive, and need be no more significant psychologically, than it was in 1904.  Europe in the 19th century was traumatised by terrorist attacks, often at the hands of nationalist extremists prepared to die for their cause. The entire UK has suffered the anguish of IRA terrorism for the last thirty years.  Ordinary people developed means of coping, as they did during the Blitz, ways of keeping their lives and states of mind in balance.

Yet our leaders will not allow us, privately and sensibly, to come to terms with these risks.  In speech after speech (even from Ken Livingstone and Met Chief Sir John Stevens) they ask us to believe that the heavens are about to cave in, and that Armageddon is nigh.  Yet that is not true.  We are asked to authorise more and more draconic measures of police and military intervention, far beyond the necessary minima - upon the pretext of “protecting us all”.  The wave of new Underground posters in London, warning against unattended luggage, will itself generate far more anxiety than any actual attack will ever effect.  And the broadcast, as well as the printed and electronic media, have a common interest in reinforcing the panic triggered by our leaders.    

Leadership should be about the projection of a far more balanced rationale, free of panic, free of alarmism, free of dramatisation.  In my observation of the public, I am deeply impressed by an overwhelming sense of daily continuity, a sane concern with the daily round, the common task.  Our leaders are clearly out of their depth, fomenting anxiety rather than allaying it. 

This is, my friends, the same ol’ world, warts an' all.  Evil people can certainly wreak the most awful havoc - however optimistic the rest of us may be.  But it is wrong to give way to generalised  preoccupations with “Evil”, as Blair has done, or any populist Axis of Evil.   The challenge for all is to concentrate upon the 99% of life which is unaffected by urban guerrilla attacks, and to learn a balanced sense of perspective about the remainder.

The challenge is to recognise and celebrate the favourable trends of the modern world, for they are evident - improving race relations, the mitigation of poverty, the reduction of ignorance, improved health, increased concern with the rights and freedoms of all the people of this world.  

  • Our leaders should be helping us to do that,
    not inducing terror and despair.

What do you think?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page

 

 
 
 
 
   

Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE