|
|
Back to Home Page
|
|
Renewing participatory democracy Multiple Differential Uncertainty
|
050321 Make sure you
have not missed the previous edition Check it out And the one before that? Other recent topics highlighted here
Week 12 Wednesday
I suppose I am part of Labour's problem. A faithful Old Labour OAP member, but diverting increasingly from my Party. I will still vote Labour but with resignation rather than enthusiasm, and praying for the Blair era to come to a rapid end. I admired the political skill of the Budget - except for its continuing failure to acknowledge the seriousness of the pensions issue. But I am not moved to do anything for Labour than the minimum - paying membership dues and casting my vote for the Party candidate.
Budget Postscript: Andrew Rawnsley, pinpointing Labour's Achilles Heel (" Never mind the bungs, where's the vision?"), castigated the Stamp Duty relief for cheaper houses as "economically illiterate". And so it is. Because the gap would immediately be absorbed, in a market system, by house-price increases. Any sensible housebuilder, realising that his purchasers no longer faced a price-related tax-demand, would put up the house-price accordingly. Markets are funny that way, Gordon... Mobile Myths
Every new technology seems to generate its own myths. And the mobile phone was no exception. One fear was that mobile phones could trigger vapour-explosions, on petrol-station forecourts. Dire warnings still disfigure many forecourts. But research has now shown that there is no such risk.
.... drop me a line Strange Death
The craven Commons majority showed no understanding of the key values of a free society: everything was up for grabs, for trading. Precious traditions were indeed traded, simply because our politicians were fearful of being blamed for a terrorist attack. They were intent upon saving their electoral skins. I was deeply ashamed of the Labour Party, the Party into which I am held by loyalty and optimism. And this was all for electoral gain. All that mattered, to most of those speaking in the Commons, was the verdict of the voters. What failed, last week, was not only the integrity of the Labour majority, but the very institution of salaried politicians. They are terrified of electoral defeat, because their very livelihoods are at stake. So terrified was everyone, of sending the "wrong message" to the electorate, that all sense of principle was abandoned.
Will Hutton recalls...
I always enjoy reading Will Hutton, and his recent piece in The Observer was no exception. He took a very broad look at the collapse of the "old Left" and of the Trade Union movement, prompted by the 20th anniversary of the collapse of the Miners' Strike, in 1985. I nodded agreement as I read. The collapse of the old collectivism now seems complete, and the winners and losers better identified. But the Left has found no alternative banner around which radicals can re-group. I believe, against the odds I admit, that the human rights agenda, internationally and nationally, offers the Left an alternative framework of convincing principle, well adapted to current political challenges. The language of human rights is now universal, universally comprehensible, and compelling.
Never miss
|
Labour's philosophical vacuum >>> Forget Iraq? No fear! >>> Camilla's Wedding - go ahead >>> Bangladesh legal bombshell >>> Disabled-friendly websites >>> Language the music of the mind >>> Asylum destitution grave injustice >>> I will vote Labour, but... >>> Migration should be legal >>> London dysfunctional city >>> Referendum? Wrong question >>> How politicians abuse "contracts" >>> Abolish Wrongful Dismissal >>> Adjustment Pay for every worker >>>
.... drop me a lineI am affronted
Nothing insults my political intelligence more than the Labour policy (for England) of developing privately sponsored "city academies" to replace mainstream comprehensive schools. They are a poisoned chalice, inherited by the new Education Minister Ruth Kelly.
I remain committed to the concept of the neighbourhood comprehensive, which seeks to deliver educational excellence, on an egalitarian footing, to each pupil in his or her home environment. This great and simple socialist commitment is being sacrificed, by Labour to the pursuit of an uncertain public/private partnership which gives rich men a prominence and a power which they should not have, in a democracy. Given the additional state expenditure committed to these unprincipled institutions in England, even their success can only have the effect of impoverishing and subverting neighbouring schools. When we get rid of Blair, we should put City Academies firmly onto the back-burner and concentrate upon the excellence of mainstream school provision. Corporate Manslaughter
Most crimes involve a person displaying some kind of "criminal intent" (mens rea, as the Latin tags have it). Yet that idea can apply only to "natural" persons, with minds, intentions, moral constraints: you make nonsense of it, if you try and apply it to an artificial person, like a company or a council. It is partly designed to influence a natural person in advance, to discourage the commission of crime in the first place. And as such, with natural persons it makes sense, and has some success.
It will always be like that. The way to influence an artificial person is to penalise "it" by heavy fines and restrictions upon "its" trading freedom, requiring standards to be observed which are scrupulously enforced by inspection - that is the only way. Standards should be defined in objective terms, the breach of which is obvious without any need to prove "intent".
My solution? A global campaign for company law reform that would remove many of the worst abuses of power at source.
"Old" Federalism
050321 Make sure you
have not missed
Week 12 Wednesday
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Created by GMID Design & Communication COPYRIGHT
NOTICE |