You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   
  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 
New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0076A   1076, 1077

1060   7 February 2005 

Volunteers?
Yes, but ...

I share the Government's new-found enthusiasm for volunteers and volunteering.  I can see mixed motives behind the move: volunteers come cheap, and can help to achieve social goals at minimal cost to the Exchequer.  Gordon Brown is, after all, leading the drive.  And if a powerful third-sector of volunteers could be developed, it would help to dish local government, the terminal destruction of which if firmly on the Westminster agenda.  Much of the New Localism which will inform Labour's manifesto is similarly driven.

Now: this is not necessarily an ignoble or self-seeking agenda.  Local government is indeed in a bad way, much of it beyond the point of no return, as a viable form of government.  For my part, I favour the emergence of more professional regional government (on the Welsh Assembly model, but for smaller city regions) coupled with a massive expansion of "neighbourhood government", building on but superseding the current range of parish and community Councils.  Such a system would accommodate a huge increase in opportunities for volunteers, which could prove a real gain for participatory democracy.

But is the Government serious about this vision?  I have yet to be convinced.  My suspicion is that the whole strategy is designed to entrench Westminster power, not to devolve it. 

When the Victorians transformed our governmental system (in the 1888-1895 period) they created a whole new "political community" of elected Councillors and lay Magistrates (often overlapping cadres) which had real power to govern their communities.  That system has lasted a century, but it has now run out of steam. 

Similar ingenuity is needed now.  We should create the status of "Public Trustee", citizens qualified as Board members of local voluntary bodies, to assist the structuring of this new regime.  We should develop a third, community-level advocates' profession.  We should go much further with community policing, giving volunteers - through community Watch Committees - real power to affect local life. 

Is the Government serious about all this?  Or are volunteers merely seen as cheap labour, to be bossed around by "the professionals" who merely obey orders from above?

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


1061  7 February 2005

Wrong
referendum question

What the question should be...

The Tories must be rubbing their eyes in disbelief.  The Government plans effectively to ask the Electorate whether they wish to "establish a Constitution for the EU".   And for the majority of voters, the answer to that misconceived question must be No...

For that is simply not the issue.  There is an EU Constitution already, which has regulated the Union for over 40 years.  It exists, derived from multiple sources, and has been frequently revised and updated.  And if this most recent Revision does not go through, simplifying its use and bringing all its provisions together between two covers, the Union will simply carry on with it present higgledy-piggledy Constitution.  True, new powers to get tough on terrorism will not be covered, nor will improved third-world aid.  The offices of President and Foreign Minister will not be enhanced as envisaged.

But that's all.  Peter Hain was, politically, unwise to have described the new Constitution as "simply tidying up" - but he was in essence correct.  Apart from a few mechanical issues (definition of a "qualified majority", changed seat-numbers in Parliament), nothing is changed by this re-run of the Constitution.

The Government is therefore barmy, if it wants to win the Referendum, to adopt this wording.  The wording should have been -

Do you approve this latest Revision of the EU Constitution, which strengthens the EU in the war against terrorism and as a humanitarian aid donor, and accommodates the increasing number of European member States?

That would be vastly more accurate.  And before you ask: Yes I have read the new Treaty.  And having in my youth studied French and German public and administrative law, I understand precisely what the Treaty is about.

  • And the answer to the second Referendum question would be YES..

  •  Drop me a line
  •  < Back to Home Page

     

     
     
     
     
       

    Created by GMID Design & Communication

    COPYRIGHT NOTICE
    The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
    - is that a deal?  Roger WE