You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   

  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 


New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0022D  526,527

526  13 November 2002   

Disarmed Services

All the talk of war-on-Iraq seems to have swamped an incredible speech last week from Scotland’s very own (Lord) George Robertson, now the Secretary-General of NATO. I found it reported in the Daily Telegraph… 

Speaking in Brussels ahead of next week’s NATO summit in Prague, he was scathing about the military investment programmes of NATO members.  The problem, he claimed, was that NATO troops were not action-ready.  They were neither organised nor equipped for rapid deployment. 

  • “There are 2,000,000 troops in uniform in Europe, half a million more than the Americans have, but only a fraction of them are in practice deployable.  That is a waste of money…  There are 2,800 attack aircraft, compared to half that number in the American forces.  Each of the US planes can fly day and night, but only ten of the huge European fleet can perform in that way – that is a waste of money as well.  The United States has 250 wide-bodied extra-large planes which can take troops to where a crisis is.  In the whole of Europe we have only eleven planes that can do the same.  We need modernised forces able to go wherever they are needed, and to stay for as long as required.”

This is an authoritative and damning indictment.  Readers will know that, although a peaceable chap by nature (and organiser every Saturday of the Swansea Peace Vigil against attacking Iraq), I am not a pacifist.  I do consider that the deployment of armed force may be necessary, both for “policing” purposes and for defence against aggressive attack. 

It follows that I am appalled by George Robertson’s disclosures.  These reports do reveal grievous waste of taxpayers’ money, throughout the whole of Europe.  And Robertson is ideally placed to know what is going on.   

  • Why has his report not been given greater prominence?

  • Can you think of a good reason?

What do you think?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


527   18 November 2002   

No fool like an old fool…

… and Valery Giscard D’Estaing is certainly an old fool.  His remarks about the exclusion of Turkey from the European Union prove his foolishness, beyond a peradventure.  Because, although he is right about Turkey, he wrong about the European Union. 

I have never visited Turkey.  My impression is of a young, turbulent country with “European” aspirations, but with strong Middle East roots. Constantinople was a European name, derived from the Greek. Istanbul is not.  That ambivalence is of very long standing indeed.  So Giscard has got his cultural analysis right. 

But that is all.  The European Union is merely a political association of contiguous states, to which cultural homogeneity is not a necessary component.  Giscard is making the same mistake as De Gaulle made, in ruling out UK membership in 1992.  That was a fateful and destructive “Non”, which has dominated the course of European politics every since.  Britain was not “European”, thought Mongeneral, because it was an island.  And island folk differ from continental folk, do they not?  They should not be allowed to join the Continental Culture Club. 

That is not the way to conduct international politics.  “Europe” is a powerful geographical expression, but no more.  The European Union should not be allowed to become a narrow, inward-looking cultural fortress.  Multi-cultural forms of society are extending rapidly, throughout its member states.  And our political traditions are strong enough to generate a multi-cultural, multi-ethnic network of states, where Turkey would be at home, and to which Turkey should be made welcome.  I agree with Peter Preston, who was forthright on this issue, writing in The Guardian.

What do you think?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page

 

 

 
 


 

 
 

 

Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE