You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   

  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 


New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0031D  616, 617

616  3 February 2003   

Option Eight

When Tony Blair last week announced his backing for an appointed second Chamber, in a very public Commons aside, Robin Cook went stratospheric.  He has been the great advocate of an elected second Chamber.  I heard Robin Cook speaking at a London Fabian Conference last Saturday, and he is defiant.  

But as a lifelong abolitionist, let me highlight the closing line of Robin Cook's reported reaction, by way of throwaway (although he did not repeat this thought, in his Saturday speech) -

  • It would be false to suggest that abolishing the Lords could be added to
    the seven options already tabled. A legitimate second Chamber must have a
    democratic mandate, and the authority that goes with it.  But if we're not
    prepared to do it, we should be honest and recognise that the consequence of
    that is not to have a second chamber."

Robin - welcome to the Club!  Be a democrat, and allow MPs an Option Eight!   Let us give our MPs additional responsibilities, by assigning 150 of them to a new Revising Division of the Commons.  They could sit in the old Lords Chamber, which would not be needed for its original purpose..   

  • Outright abolition of the Lords was Labour Party policy until 1985, and it remains the only satisfactory solution.   

  • Vote for Option Eight - that's what I say.

Editorial Footnote:  Subsequently, the "Outright Abolition" Option was voted upon - and attracted 172 Commons votes - a historic roll-call - they are listed here.

Do you have any experience of this great century-long political saga?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


617   3 February 2003   

Old Dogs, New Tricks

Socialists must re-learn the limits of State power.  And we must propose a new international socialist order, consistent with those new perceptions.  In large, complex societies, there are certain points at which State power can be exercised effectively, to achieve socialist ends.  There are others where it cannot, given overriding principles of human dignity and sovereignty, and the distinctive features of human personality.  For example, it has proved impossible to re-distribute wealth through the wage-packet - by any form of mandatory Incomes Policy, or by varying income tax-rates to reduce differentials. Societal propensities for hierarchy and functional differentiation are very powerful - socialists should acknowledge that strength and work around it.

Even the health promotion agenda is problematical, as it brings the State into areas of traditional personal privacy.  I remain uneasy, for example, by draconic Government campaign against smoking.  There is nothing socialist about the Government's adherence to "prohibition", in the misconceived "campaign against drugs".  Many attempts to regulate anti-social behaviour by Court Order have ended in failure. And Ministers' latest attempts to intervene with University selection processes, to favour "working class candidates" are also doomed to fail. The appointment of a Fair Access Regulator is a silly idea, a mere device to divert attention from the
Government's unfair fee-charging policy.  

Socialist objectives should be achieved in other, simpler, ways.  And the challenge is to develop new socialist guidelines which will command international acceptance, enjoy international validity.  In seeking to reduce inequalities, our primary focus should be on (i) education – (ii) healthcare - (iii) unemployment relief – (iv) state pensions – and (v) a commitment to the underlying equality agenda of the human rights movement. 

 < Back to Home Page

 

 
 


 

 
 

 

Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE