| |
New
Living Diary
Index
New participatory democracy
Taming
the Corporations
My Welsh socialism
My New Socialist
Settlement
Globalise the left!
Bevan re-visited
|
|
|
item0047C 774, 775
774
28 July 2003
GM
Is the issue, at base, a religious one?
I
have been searching the depths of my own mind, on GM issues.
For I find that I am untouched by all the horrific Frankenstein food
predictions. I rebel, certainly, at the use of genetic engineering as a
vehicle for corporate dominance, through the patenting of new species and
genetic variations - and I am convinced we need new political strategies to
counter the abuse of "private power" by this means.
But I do not fear "pollution" by GM crops.
The Friends of the Earth cut no ice with me. I am profoundly sceptical about
the precautionary principle. Human development requires constant
experimentation, constant risk-taking of all kinds - I can easily imagine
future generations becoming entrapped in their own fears, failing to
experiment and to drive forward. Besides, humankind is in any event
beset by risks and threats on all sides, in a constant battle between life
and death, between sickness and health, between survival and extinction. The
human frame seems to me to a veritable set of molecular systems design to do
battle effectively against assailant organisms. I am optimistic about
the very forces of human optimism, and the capacity of humankind to counter
the forces arrayed against the species.
But more important,
I have a clear image of the life-force as benevolent and beneficent. If
I cut my finger, does it not heal? If an abnormal foetus is conceived and
seriously defective, is it not naturally aborted? Is there not an order in
nature, predisposed to the cultivation of orderly growth and species
development? If GM experimentation were to generate dangerous or
destructive life-forms, would they not fail? Would they thrive, to threaten
mankind and other forms of life?
I think not.
Mankind has
experimented with
plant and animal-breeding for hundreds, if not thousands, of years - and
"nature" clearly favours coherent species development. This systemic
confidence is my lodestar, and I follow it as a matter of trust and
conviction. I suspect that the confidence has some religious foundation,
somewhere in the recesses of my mind, perhaps even subconscious in character.
- It follows
that I concentrate on the political and legal dimensions of
GM, and of the abuse of power that it threatens.
What do you think? Is this a religious position? Drop me a line
<
Back to Home Page
775 4
August
2003
Six short years
But where's 'da beef?
Blair has surpassed the Attlee record, surviving in
Downing Street for more than six calendar years.
But what is the
condition of my Party? Not good.
What are they? I say that the Left must start to give
convincing answers on all these fronts - some of which are already being addressed,
albeit half-heartedly. But the Blair Government risks being
sidetracked by too many
minor interventionist "projects"...
-
Social justice
- there is no appetite for old-style socialist egalitarianism, but our
fellow-citizens continue to be affronted by the unjustifiable extremes of
wealth and poverty that continue to disfigure our society. It is not
enough merely to "eliminate poverty" as a matter of fact, what is needed is
a philosophy which explains the wrongfulness of such extremes - man is a
moral creature, and demands a moral explanation - Human Rights, enforceable
through the Courts, must become part of future concepts of social justice -
and the rights of the workforce, in their perpetual confrontation with "the
employer", should form an integral part of this agenda.
-
Peaceful prospects
- global conflict increasingly
disturbs the peace of mind of our fellow-citizens, and the Left cannot
simply muddle through with good intentions - relationships with the US must
be re-configured - making a success of the EU will be essential, for Labour,
and it must be done in distinctive socialist style, for distinctive
socialist reasons - similarly, on the home-front the generation of a more
coherent philosophy of civic order, consistent with Human Rights, liberal in
character and respectful of human individuality and freedom - Labour's "law
and order platform" has been wrecked by Straw and Blunkett, it has
become narrow and mean-spirited, vindictive and unimaginative, populist and
fearful of a perceived prejudices of "the mob" - the Left must
give real substance to the maintenance of "the Queen's Peace", linked
closely with the reduction of disruptive social injustice - and
internationally, the inculcation
of a more peaceful world is fundamental to the prospects of the global
economy - as consumer economies flourish, it is becoming ever clearer that the world cannot afford war any more.
Even Bush will be forced to learn this lesson - we should be preaching it
first.
-
Lifelong learning
- my nose tells me that the ability
of every adult to change course, to re-deal the cards of youth, is of
growing importance, as the majority are better educated, living longer and understanding more about life's
options - our society already devotes major resources to school and
university education, coinciding with the natural period of the child's maturation to
adulthood, and the importance of that allocation is not in
doubt - socialist perceptions now require the spotlight to shift to adult
education, with a coherent philosophy of continuing development;
-
Tame
the Corporations! Labour must dig deep, and find the
courage to confront the labyrinthine wrongs of our systems of artificial
personality, which interpenetrate "Western" civilisation - civilisation has
become enmeshed in a thicket of interlocking company-law systems, a
nightmare of our own making, which disempowers Governments, promotes the
grossest forms of personal and social injustice, and has become a primary
vehicle for the abuse of power throughout human society.
-
Support when unemployed
- Labour has been blessed with
a period of high employment and economic growth - our public support systems
for the un employed have not been stretched in recent years, and remain
institutionally weak
- the Left must propose a more coherent rationale of support following
job-loss, both in terms of training and support
-
Security in old age -
and the anticipation of such security -the majority of our fellow
citizens, both in the UK and in continental Europe, experience growing
anxiety because of the weakness of society's old age pension systems,
whether "State", private or supported - the Left has never really grasped
this nettle, and it must do so now.
Blair could perm any three
from six, and lay the ground for a successful, radical Third
Term. The task is to redefine "socialism for the middle classes" -
because only a small minority of the under-40s now identify with traditional
working-class perceptions, and we must approach them differently. I have never been
convinced that the two pillars of Blair's second term (namely the education
of children, and the provision of healthcare) constitute the
commanding heights of political ambition - while essential, they represent
no more than the obvious
common ground - where Tory, LibDem and Labour are bound to meet.
Indeed, it is difficult to find any distinctive socialist policies in these
sectors - there is nothing to inspire the socialist troops.
What do you think? Drop me a line
<
Back to Home Page
|
|