You are in the company of 
Roger Warren Evans
   

  Part of   www.LivePolitics.net                                 < Back to Home Page  
 


New
Living Diary
Index


New  participatory democracy

Taming the Corporations

My Welsh socialism

My New Socialist Settlement

Globalise the left!

Bevan  re-visited


RWE Biography

 

   

item0047C  774, 775

774   28 July 2003   

GM
Is the issue, at base, a religious one?

I have been searching the depths of my own mind, on GM issues. For I find that I am untouched by all the horrific Frankenstein food predictions.  I rebel, certainly, at the use of genetic engineering as a vehicle for corporate dominance, through the patenting of new species and genetic variations - and I am convinced we need new political strategies to counter the abuse of "private power" by this means.

But I do not fear "pollution" by GM crops.  The Friends of the Earth cut no ice with me. I am profoundly sceptical about the precautionary principle. Human development requires constant experimentation, constant risk-taking of all kinds - I can easily imagine future generations becoming entrapped in their own fears, failing to experiment and to drive forward.  Besides, humankind is in any event beset by risks and threats on all sides, in a constant battle between life and death, between sickness and health, between survival and extinction. The human frame seems to me to a veritable set of molecular systems design to do battle effectively against assailant organisms.  I am optimistic about the very forces of human optimism, and the capacity of humankind to counter the forces arrayed against the species.

But more important, I have a clear image of the life-force as benevolent and beneficent.  If I cut my finger, does it not heal? If an abnormal foetus is conceived and seriously defective, is it not naturally aborted? Is there not an order in nature, predisposed to the cultivation of orderly growth and species development?  If GM experimentation were to generate dangerous or destructive life-forms, would they not fail?  Would they thrive, to threaten mankind and other forms of life?  I think not. 

Mankind has experimented with plant and animal-breeding for hundreds, if not thousands, of years - and "nature" clearly favours coherent species development. This systemic confidence is my lodestar, and I follow it as a matter of trust and conviction. I suspect that the confidence has some religious foundation, somewhere in the recesses of my mind, perhaps even subconscious in character.

  • It follows that I concentrate on the political and legal dimensions of GM, and of the abuse of power that it threatens.

What do you think?  Is this a religious position?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


775  4 August  2003  

Six short years
But where's 'da beef?

Blair has surpassed the Attlee record, surviving in Downing Street for more than six calendar years.   But what is the condition of my Party?  Not good. 

  • We are failing to address the key socialist issues of our time.  

What are they?  I say that the Left must start to give convincing answers on all these fronts - some of which are already being addressed, albeit half-heartedly.  But the Blair Government risks being sidetracked by too many minor interventionist "projects"...

  • Social justice - there is no appetite for old-style socialist egalitarianism, but our fellow-citizens continue to be affronted by the unjustifiable extremes of wealth and poverty that continue to disfigure our society.  It is not enough merely to "eliminate poverty" as a matter of fact, what is needed is a philosophy which explains the wrongfulness of such extremes - man is a moral creature, and demands a moral explanation - Human Rights, enforceable through the Courts, must become part of future concepts of social justice - and the rights of the workforce, in their perpetual confrontation with "the employer", should form an integral part of this agenda.

  • Peaceful prospects - global conflict increasingly disturbs the peace of mind of our fellow-citizens, and the Left cannot simply muddle through with good intentions - relationships with the US must be re-configured - making a success of the EU will be essential, for Labour, and it must be done in distinctive socialist style, for distinctive socialist reasons - similarly, on the home-front the generation of a more coherent philosophy of civic order, consistent with Human Rights, liberal in character and respectful of human individuality and freedom - Labour's "law and order platform" has been wrecked by Straw and Blunkett, it has become narrow and mean-spirited, vindictive and unimaginative, populist and fearful of a perceived prejudices of "the mob" - the Left must give real substance to the maintenance of "the Queen's Peace", linked closely with the reduction of disruptive social injustice - and internationally, the inculcation of a more peaceful world is fundamental to the prospects of the global economy - as consumer economies flourish, it is becoming ever clearer that the world cannot afford war any more.  Even Bush will be forced to learn this lesson - we should be preaching it first.

  • Lifelong learning - my nose tells me that the ability of every adult to change course, to re-deal the cards of youth, is of growing importance, as the majority are better educated, living longer and understanding more about life's options - our society already devotes major resources to school and university education, coinciding with the natural period of the child's maturation to adulthood, and the importance of that allocation is not in doubt - socialist perceptions now require the spotlight to shift to adult education, with a coherent philosophy of continuing development;

  • Tame the Corporations!  Labour must dig deep, and find the courage to confront the labyrinthine wrongs of our systems of artificial personality, which interpenetrate "Western" civilisation - civilisation has become enmeshed in a thicket of interlocking company-law systems, a nightmare of our own making, which disempowers Governments, promotes the grossest forms of personal and social injustice, and has become a primary vehicle for the abuse of power throughout human society.

  • Support when unemployed - Labour has been blessed with a period of high employment and economic growth - our public support systems for the un employed have not been stretched in recent years, and remain institutionally weak - the Left must propose a more coherent rationale of support following job-loss, both in terms of training and support

  • Security in old age - and the anticipation of such security -the majority of our fellow citizens, both in the UK and in continental Europe, experience growing anxiety because of the weakness of society's old age pension systems, whether "State", private or supported - the Left has never really grasped this nettle, and it must do so now.

Blair could perm any three from six, and lay the ground for a successful, radical Third Term.  The task is to redefine "socialism for the middle classes" - because only a small minority of the under-40s now identify with traditional working-class perceptions, and we must approach them differently.  I have never been convinced that the two pillars of Blair's second term (namely the education of children, and the provision of healthcare) constitute the commanding heights of political ambition - while essential, they represent no more than the obvious common ground - where Tory, LibDem and Labour are bound to meet.  Indeed, it is difficult to find any distinctive socialist policies in these sectors - there is nothing to inspire the socialist troops.

  • For that, Labour III will have to look elsewhere.

What do you think?  Drop me a line

 < Back to Home Page

 

 
 


 

 
 

 

Created by GMID Design & Communication

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
The originating content of this website is my own work, and subject to my copyright. But on one condition only, I hereby give my consent to its unrestricted reproduction for any purpose: the condition is that its source is subject to proper acknowledgment, giving my name, my assertion of copyright, and the name of this website as its source, namely: www.warrenevans.net
- is that a deal?  Roger WE